Supreme Court modifies earlier directive, allows release of stray dogs in original localities after vaccination

The Supreme Court of India has modified its earlier directive on managing stray dogs in Delhi and the National Capital Region on 22^nd August 2025. In its new order, the Court has allowed the release of sterilized and vaccinated stray dogs into the same localities from where they were picked up. This decision comes as a relief to animal rights activists, civic bodies, and citizens who were worried about the earlier blanket removal of dogs from public spaces.

Stray Dogs Must Be Vaccinated and Sterilized

The Court made it clear that stray dogs cannot be relocated permanently. Instead, they must be sterilized, vaccinated, and dewormed before being released back to their original areas. This ensures that the stray dog population can be controlled in a scientific and humane manner. At the same time, rabid or highly aggressive stray dogs will be kept in shelters for public safety.

Designated Feeding Zones for Stray Dogs

Another important part of the ruling is the creation of feeding zones for stray dogs. The Supreme Court directed civic bodies to identify safe spaces where animal lovers can feed stray dogs. Feeding on busy streets and residential areas will now be limited to avoid conflict between residents and feeders. These feeding points will also help keep stray dogs healthier and more visible to authorities for monitoring vaccinations.

National Policy on Stray Dogs Management

The Court further stressed the need for a uniform national policy to manage stray dogs across India. This policy will align with the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules and ensure the same approach is followed in all states. By standardizing sterilization, vaccination, and feeding practices, authorities will be able to control the stray dog population effectively while protecting public safety.

A Humane Balance between People and Stray Dogs

The revised order has been welcomed by animal welfare groups and political leaders. Activists argued that removing stray dogs to overcrowded shelters would have caused cruelty and increased the risk of disease. On the other hand, local residents had raised concerns about bites and safety. By allowing vaccinated stray dogs to stay in their localities, the Court has chosen a middle path that balances compassion with safety.

This judgment highlights that stray dogs are part of the community and must be managed with care. With proper vaccination, sterilization, and regulated feeding, the coexistence of humans and stray dogs can become safer and more harmonious.