Delhi High Court orders takedown of fake sites offering jobs at Zepto Grants interim injunction in trade mark dispute

Background of the Zepto Trademark Dispute Delhi High Court

In a significant development, the Zepto trademark dispute Delhi High Court came up before a Single Judge Bench of Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora. The case involved an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC), seeking an ex-parte ad-interim injunction. Zepto, the well-known quick-commerce platform, alleged that several fake websites, domain names, and social media accounts were using its registered trademark  to mislead the public. These platforms were allegedly soliciting payments from unsuspecting individuals for fraudulent job opportunities and fake franchise offers.

Zepto stated that Defendants, along with unidentified parties were running a widespread scam. They had registered and operated infringing domain names such as zeptojob.com and zeptojobs.in, falsely portraying themselves as official Zepto recruitment portals. Several fake social media pages on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn also claimed to represent Zepto relationship managers, demanding payments in various bank accounts.

Court’s Analysis in Zepto Trademark Dispute Delhi High Court

The Court carefully reviewed the evidence, including forged letters, misleading emails, and fake job postings that used Zepto’s brand name. It also noted the unauthorized use of names and photographs of Zepto’s management team. The Court observed that the defendants were clearly misusing Zepto’s trademark, causing confusion and misleading the public.

In its analysis, the Court emphasized that the balance of convenience lay in favor of Zepto. If no injunction was granted, irreparable loss and damage would be caused to the company’s reputation and goodwill. Therefore, the Court concluded that immediate intervention was necessary in the Zepto trademark dispute Delhi High Court matter.

Court’s Directions in Zepto Trademark Dispute Delhi High Court

Granting the ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Court passed several directions to curb the fraudulent activities:

1. Defendants, their employees, agents, and associates were restrained from using Zepto’s trademark for fraudulent recruitment, phishing, or impersonation.
2. The defendants were directed to suspend, block, take down, and transfer all infringing domain names and email addresses.
3. Domain Name Registrars were ordered to block and suspend the infringing websites.
4. Banks were instructed to freeze accounts linked to the fraudulent scheme.
5. Meta Platforms and LinkedIn were directed to delete and suspend all related accounts and posts.
6. The Department of Telecommunication was directed to block associated phone numbers.
7. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology was instructed to block and suspend all infringing domain names.

Significance of Zepto Trademark Dispute Delhi High Court

The Zepto trademark dispute Delhi High Court highlights the growing menace of online scams misusing established brand names. By granting a strong interim injunction, the Court reaffirmed that trademark misuse, particularly in the digital space, cannot be tolerated. This case also demonstrates the judiciary’s proactive approach in protecting businesses and consumers from fraud.

In conclusion, the Zepto trademark dispute Delhi High Court serves as a reminder that legal protections for trademarks extend beyond physical goods and cover online platforms, domains, and social media as well.

The matter was listed for further adjudication on 18-2-2026.

Case details: [Zepto Pvt. Ltd. v. Owner of Domain Name Zeptonowindia.com, CS (COMM) No. 895 of 2025, decided on 26-8-2025].