The 57th GST council meeting was held on 8th October 2026 to propose key recommendations to the existing GST taxation framework. The recommendations were proposed to simplify the GST framework and introduce changes that build a conducive environment for businesses in India.
The 57th GST Council Meeting has recommended improvements to the GST registration process. Many businesses find the process cumbersome.
The suggestions of the council were to have clear guidelines to register, streamline the application forms, improve the GST portal, and allow taxpayers to update their details. Automatically approve cancellation requests.
Many businesses that export and those who have an inverted duty structure (paying more tax on their input purchases than they receive on their output sales) may experience cash flow issues due to a slow refund process.
The Council has suggested streamlining the refund process. Several changes have been suggested to the refund process. This includes automatic acknowledgements, automatic sanctioning of 90% provisional refunds for zero-rated supplies and inverted duty structure. A new system will be introduced for auto refund of surplus balances in an electronic cash ledger.
The Council recommended extending the refund for accumulated ITC in certain cases and also removing the restrictions on ITC in section 17(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.
Refunds of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be claimed for certain input services and capital goods, as long as all criteria and time frames are met. For businesses with an inverted duty structure, refunds for eligible input services will be allowed. This is for ITC claimed on or after 1 November 2026. Refunds of capital goods will also be allowed for eligible ITC claimed on or after 1 April 2027. These refunds will be paid in instalments over the course of sixty months.
The 57th GST Council Meeting has suggested improvements to the enforcement of GST legislation to ensure it is proportionate to the size of the business whilst still ensuring they do not fall victim to tax evasion and fraud.
The Council recommended increasing the prosecution threshold from Rs. 1 Crore to Rs. 5 Crore. All arrest provisions are proposed to be removed. The maximum general penalty in Section 125 of the CGST Act was reduced from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000.
The Council also suggested reducing the maximum pre-deposit for appeals where there is no demand but only a penalty to Rs. 40 Crore.
The Council has suggested making changes to GSTR-1, GSTR-1A, Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) and GSTR-3B. This will allow taxpayers to rectify any mistakes, reverse charge supplies can be accurately declared, and ITC can be reconciled.
The Council has suggested introducing a voluntary Annual Return Quarterly Payment system for all eligible taxpayers with a turnover of less than or equal to Rs. 5 Crores in the previous financial year. This will only apply to unregistered persons (B2C supplies).
The Council has suggested changing how litigation will be handled. They recommended that no demand notices will be issued if less than Rs. 10,000 of tax is owed. If taxpayers voluntarily pay their tax liability, all references to penalty should be changed to charge. Taxpayers who pay their tax liabilities and interest within thirty days (Section 73) or sixty days (Section 74A) of the adjudication order for non-fraud cases will receive a five percent reduction in penalties. The maximum general penalty has also been reduced from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000.
All taxpayers with an aggregate turnover of less than or equal to Rs. 5 Crores in the previous fiscal year will have late fees waived for late return filing (Section 39(1)) of the CGST Act. As long as the late return is filed before the end of the month the return would normally be filed in.
The Council has recommended simplifying the GST registration for small business owners who sell goods or services via an online marketplace. They have also suggested providing clarity on the tax liabilities for e-commerce companies providing certain services under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act, regardless of their business model.
The Council has suggested ways to make it easier for companies to export services. This will allow services to be exported in certain circumstances. This will be achieved by allowing certain services supplied to or through an overseas headquarters, branch office, agent or representative office to be given an export status. The Council has also suggested changes to provide clarity on what zero-rated supplies can apply to Special Economic Zones (SEZ) and Free Trade Warehousing Zones (FTWZ).
The 57th GST Council Meeting has marked a key step in moving forward towards a more efficient, transparent, and easy-to-use GST system in India. The recommendations were made to help with the key issues businesses have faced in recent years. These include slow registration processes, slow refunds, limited ITC, and complex compliance. There was also a lack of clarity on how to deal with disputes. Once these reforms have been put into place, businesses will see more cash flow and fewer unnecessary disputes.
The main aim was to propose recommendations to simplify GST procedures and ensure GST compliance is predictable. Recommendations were made to improve GST registration, GST return filing, refunds, ITC, penalties, dispute resolution, and export benefits.
Recommendations were to improve clarity in documentation, simplify form GST REG-01, and improve the GST portal. This will help reduce errors, unnecessary queries, and delays.
Changes were suggested to GSTR-1, GSTR-1A, IMS, GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B to ensure tax liabilities match ITC. The Council has also suggested using this alternative method from the April 2027 period to reconcile ITC and tax liability.
The Council has suggested that the pre-deposit for appealing an order to the Appellate Authority/Appellate Tribunal should be limited to Rs. 40 Crore where there is no demand but only penalties. This will apply to both CGST (Rs. 20 Crore) and SGST/UTGST (Rs. 20 Crore).
When stopping a vehicle transporting goods, there will generally be a need for a specific intelligence report and approval from an officer of the rank of Joint Commissioner or above. Restrictions have also been recommended on interception in transit states, unless there are certain documentation issues.
Connect with Our Experts for Personalised Assistance